Mark Roman | February 15, 2017 | news
Politicians who criticize judges are front and center in the news right now. Donald Trump called a federal judge who temporarily suspended his immigration ban a “so-called judge” whose decision was “ridiculous.”
Closer to home, House Speaker Richard Corcoran called for term limits for state judges. Among other things, Corcoran said judges need to be restrained because their decisions are “an edict from on high” and they just write law out of “whole cloth.”
Politicians know judges are easy targets for one simple reason: they can’t counterpunch in response to political attacks. Judges are bound by rules of ethics which essentially prevent from defending themselves against mudslinging. They cannot comment on social media about legal or political matters. They cannot match wits with critics in television interviews either.
Judges are also bound, as they should be, not to comment on cases pending before them. They are only permitted to speak to the public through the opinions they write. This is a practical disadvantage: many judicial opinions are technical, bland, and loaded with citations. And while people can find snarky comments on social media in moments, many don’t know how to find – much less decipher – published court opinions.
Furthermore, court opinions are out of sync with the current tone of debate in our political culture. Appeals court judges and the lawyers who appear before them still put a premium on civility and decorum in the things they write. Thus, people who are amused by controversy and name-calling usually won’t find much to giggle at in court opinions.
There are some exceptions, of course. The opinions of the late Justice Scalia were often colorful and quotable, whether you agreed with the substance of them or not. Nonetheless, on average it’s much easier to read Twitter blasts than slog through the jargon of a typical court opinion. Judicial opinions can be tough sledding for even the most intelligent lay readers.
This is not to say judges should be immune from criticism. Judges are human, and they make mistakes just like any one else. Thoughtful, reasonable critique of judicial decisions is a healthy part of public debate. However, personal and disparaging criticism of judges who can’t respond is not.
There are many thoughtful, intelligent judges who would probably have plenty to say in response to political attacks against them. The only reason you don’t hear it is because they aren’t allowed to say it.
Contact the Personal Injury Law Firm Of Roman Austin Personal Injury Lawyers To Get The Help You Deserve
If you need help with your injury case or you want to learn more information, please call the Personal Injury law firm of Roman Austin Personal Injury Lawyers at (727) 787-2500 or visit the nearest location to schedule a free case evaluation today.
If you would prefer to email us, please visit our contact page.